4 ms·
You are right, but only in a very strict, not-fun, manner :). Even if we had more data on different boats sinking, the model would not be very useful: We don't
by BickNowstrom 10y ago
You are right, but only in a very strict, not-fun, manner :). Even if we had more data on different boats sinking, the model would not be very useful: We don't go with the Titanic anymore and plotted all icebergs. Still, if a cruise ship were to go down, I'd place a bet on ranking younger women of nobility traveling first class higher for survivability than old men with family traveling third class, wise predictor or no.
This dataset is more in line with what you are looking for: https://www.kaggle.com/saurograndi/airplane-crashes-since-1908 https://www.kaggle.com/saurograndi/airplane-crashes-since-19...
- taeric 10y agoMakes sense. And yes, I completely meant my points in a pedantic only manner. :)