3 ms·
> The crisis is not one of content. But one of distribution. This is undoubtedly the key aspect of the networked world. Papers have, in the past, tried to do
by jhayward 10y ago
> The crisis is not one of content. But one of distribution.
This is undoubtedly the key aspect of the networked world. Papers have, in the past, tried to do various forms of syndication and distribution bundling deals to establish a viable business model but to my knowledge these have all been abject failures. Compound this with the loss of monopoly income from local classified ads and we have implosion.
My suggestion to the industry is to not syndicate content, rather syndicate subscription. I only want to have a single "news" subscription - and it's not going to be on "your" site. So the industry should find a way for me to pay for content wherever I may find it with a single subscription, and without anyone "owning" my account. There may be a business model that works there.
- tcbawo 10y agoBetter (yet scarier) would be curated content. I would love for someone to filter the firehose of information, but I don't want to live in an echo chamber. I don't want a feed that tries to hide opinions or facts I disagree with. Provide me the basic arguments and rationale from multiple sides, not strawman arguments. Provide fact checking (with context). Today, this function would best be performed by people.