3 ms·
I don't have a problem with copyright holders getting paid long after the work. Unlike patents, where I do have a problem, copyright doesn't prevent independent
by deong 10y ago
I don't have a problem with copyright holders getting paid long after the work. Unlike patents, where I do have a problem, copyright doesn't prevent independent discovery. If you write a song, I think it's fair that you have creative and monetary control over that song for a fairly long period of time (though far shorter than the current legal frameworks provide for).
However, these type of common studio tricks look to my eye to have very little to do with copyright. They seem to be cases of just good old fashioned criminal and civil fraud. It's just that the fraud wouldn't work without copyright law behind the scenes.
- smhenderson 10y agoI wrote a book about this above but in short, I agree, I should have been more clear about my problem with the absurd lengths copyright can be extended these days. "Decades" wasn't really specific enough to get my point across. Given ST was 1984 I'd say somewhere between 1998 - 2004 would be fair and within the boundaries our original copyright laws were meant to cover.