> attention to detail was the single most predictive trait for good performance. I think you just naively reprised the premise: how exactly are you measuring

> attention to detail was the single most predictive trait for good performance. I think you just naively reprised the premise: how exactly are you measuring "good performance"? The easily observable details they were good at attending to? Of course, everybody wants an admin who doesn't make simple mistakes that cause outages, inconvenience, etc. But what about the one that provides an accurate asessment of the companies near-future needs vis-a-vis their trajectory, and recommends appropriate infrastructure upgrades?