4 ms·

Wikileaks should not serve the agenda of it's sources in reporting information, but of the citizens of the world who need more transparency that they claim to r

Wikileaks should not serve the agenda of it's sources in reporting information, but of the citizens of the world who need more transparency that they claim to represent. Here you are: https://theintercept.com/2016/08/06/accusing-wikileaks-bias-beside-point/ https://theintercept.com/2016/08/06/accusing-wikileaks-bias-... People talk a lot about how Putin is an opportunist. I think he saw how bitter Assange was becoming and understood if he gave him the documents, he could step back and let him carry out his vengeance against a woman who had a huge role in forcing him to ground in the embassy ("can't we just drone this guy?"). I'm told this is a Rule of Power. But that is speculation.

imron 10y ago
Note the key phrase from that article 'led to speculation that...' In any case, here's Assange himself discussing this exact thing recently: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6mARUrPtXk&feature=youtu.be&t=5019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6mARUrPtXk&feature=youtu.be... Doesn't seem like much of a vendetta according to him.
- thingexplainer 10y ago
  It'd been a while since I'd read the article, and you're right, I oversimplified in my memory. I appreciate the counterpoint (though I can't watch it at the moment).
  - imron 10y ago
    Here's part of his answer: "There’s been a lot of misquoting of me and WikiLeaks publications. In this particular case, the misquoting has to do with that we intend, or I intend, to harm Hillary Clinton or that I don’t like Hillary Clinton. All those are false. They come about as a result it seems of this campaign and those who are trying to personalize our publications."