Yes, games are great, and art, and Ebert's wrong about them. But I think you're unfairly judging (and berating) Ebert about much of the other stuff. He's actua

Yes, games are great, and art, and Ebert's wrong about them. But I think you're unfairly judging (and berating) Ebert about much of the other stuff. He's actually remarkably on top of things considering both his age (67) and his status (can't talk, eat, or drink due to cancer surgery and the loss of his fucking jaw!). He has an active blog with some of the best writing out there, he's hyper-active on twitter, he knows about newspapers going down and is not living in the past there, he's starting a new online presence for himself and his readers, and he doesn't "hold a grudge against video games"; he just doesn't seem them as art. Your angry rant only hurts your (mostly) valid points.