Given that art is defined differently from person to person this is pretty weak statement by its nature... I'd agree though - games contain art rather than bein

Given that art is defined differently from person to person this is pretty weak statement by its nature... I'd agree though - games contain art rather than being it. Some of the artwork done for environments and characters is incredible compared to the trash that gets passed off as modern art. This argument seems a bit light too - why does being able to win at something stop it from being art? Is he saying that nothing interactive can be art? The argument that sports and board games can not be considered art is silly too... its like saying the Sistine Chapel ceiling is not art because my plainly painted ceiling isn't - a flawed analogy.