4 ms·
It's quite historically inaccurate. It's based on the mythical Saga of Ragnar Lodbrok (who may or may not have been a real person) and peppered with artistic li
by peterwwillis 10y ago
It's quite historically inaccurate. It's based on the mythical Saga of Ragnar Lodbrok (who may or may not have been a real person) and peppered with artistic license, like Aethelstan, Ragnar's Anglo-Saxon slave-turned-brother monk, who just happens to have the name of the first English King who popped up a few decades after the seige of Paris, and how the events in the show seem to mirror real life events that occurred across a 200-year timeline. And their lack of any battle armor. But it's a fantastic show.