3 ms·

I wish that more smart people would not demonize either party and instead analyze and dissect each platform and weigh the potential benefits and consequences of

I wish that more smart people would not demonize either party and instead analyze and dissect each platform and weigh the potential benefits and consequences of them. It is much more convincing to read actual facts about the platforms, and it's a lot more constructive. With the brain power here, we might even be able to make constructive suggestions and possibly even influence either party's policies so that regardless of the outcome it works in everyone's favor. If we can point out that some component of Hillary's plan or Trump's plan will surely lead to disaster in some way, that itself may have the political power to influence revision in a positive way, especially right now since both candidates are searching for weaknesses in each other's campaigns. This is one of the most intelligent communities in the world, so let's be constructive.

DasIch 10y ago
The problem is that Trump doesn't offer much in policy, even when it comes to policy he actually talks about and this doesn't just affect the things he wants to keep secret from ISIS. He also contradicts himself quite a lot and when he touches upon policy in his talking points it's often times questionable whether he's even aware of the actual policies he's referring to and to what degree. There is just no basis for an actual discussion or comparison on policy details.
- Chris2048 10y ago
  This might be a good strategy. What good does it do? People generally evaluate a candidate on policy last. On the other hand, the best changes would be the most controversial, so probably wouldn't help his campaign.
trdrake 10y ago
This. The whole process has turned into character analysis and character assasination, rather than whose policies make the most sense for America. Both parties and the media are to blame. There's a ton I personally dislike in the published GOP platform (eliminating the EPA, walking from Kyoto, completing the Keystone, defunding Amtrak, etc, etc) that bears discussion, rather than judging and yelling who's less evil.

DasIch 10y ago

The problem is that Trump doesn't offer much in policy, even when it comes to policy he actually talks about and this doesn't just affect the things he wants to keep secret from ISIS. He also contradicts himself quite a lot and when he touches upon policy in his talking points it's often times questionable whether he's even aware of the actual policies he's referring to and to what degree. There is just no basis for an actual discussion or comparison on policy details.

Chris2048 10y ago
This might be a good strategy. What good does it do? People generally evaluate a candidate on policy last. On the other hand, the best changes would be the most controversial, so probably wouldn't help his campaign.

trdrake 10y ago

This. The whole process has turned into character analysis and character assasination, rather than whose policies make the most sense for America. Both parties and the media are to blame. There's a ton I personally dislike in the published GOP platform (eliminating the EPA, walking from Kyoto, completing the Keystone, defunding Amtrak, etc, etc) that bears discussion, rather than judging and yelling who's less evil.