3 ms·
It seems odd to me to have the innocent bystander as the one who should control their emotions by rationally deciding that it has nothing to do with them but no
by Natsu 10y ago
It seems odd to me to have the innocent bystander as the one who should control their emotions by rationally deciding that it has nothing to do with them but not to have the original person who is mad at someone else not rationally decide that their anger has nothing to do with the person they're actually dealing with.
- reddytowns 10y agoYou can show anger yet still be rational. Anger does not mean out of control. Also, yes I do believe that someone in the presence of someone else being angry should not automatically assume it is about them.