3 ms·
That argument seems to prove too much, namely that you could never stop listening to an advisor after having listened to them once. I've also found a "hidden"
by matt4077 10y ago
That argument seems to prove too much, namely that you could never stop listening to an advisor after having listened to them once.
I've also found a "hidden" inconsistency in his "philosophy": he claims to be a moral actor, and yet he founded Paypal. And – you know – gives millions to Trump.
- nickff 10y agoYour philosophy does not consist of a few case-specific conclusions; for example, deciding that you want to spend your evening watching a movie alone tells me very little about how much you value interpersonal relationships. I did not say that examining patterns of behavior was useless, but that you shouldn't dismiss people just because you disagree with them. For example, you shouldn't get a divorce just because your significant other gave you a piece of unwanted advice or criticism.