4 ms·
If you where starving and you had three choices: - Get "real food" from a humanitarian aid organization that's enough to feed yourself - Get soylent fro
by gravypod 10y ago
If you where starving and you had three choices:
- Get "real food" from a humanitarian aid organization that's enough to feed yourself
- Get soylent from an aid organization but since it would cost less you also get enough to feed a second person
- Die of hunger.
I'll take the soylent option and that's where I think it's true colors will eventually shine. I hope Rob takes it there some day. If you agree with this message you should not just say yes, you should buy some soylent. Your purchase is an investment in the future you want to see.
If you don't support that idea, then that's ok too.
- yladiz 10y agoI do support it, but just because I agree with something doesn't mean I should or have to support it directly. I also don't like this argument because I'm not the one who makes those decisions, humanitarian organizations/NGOs are, and they are the ones that decide on issues like this (for example, I naively thought that a donated vaccine would be good, but it turns out it is not good for NGOs[1]). I'm talking strictly for me and I have no plans to purchase Soylent for the reasons I mentioned in my original comment. 1: http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/10/doctors-with-borders/503786/ http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/10/doctors-wi...