3 ms·
> I have never tasted Soylent [...] but God, it took all my energy not to close the tab after reading this opening sentence. > But it [freeze-dried ice cream]
by markbao 10y ago
> I have never tasted Soylent [...] but
God, it took all my energy not to close the tab after reading this opening sentence.
> But it [freeze-dried ice cream] wasn’t ice cream, it was a simulation of ice cream, and no one in their right mind would chose it over the cold, creamy stuff on a hot day. Not even an astronaut.
The "people aren't eating it because it's inferior" line is easily defeated by the fact that people are eating Soylent. I and a good number of other people choose Soylent over real food sometimes, so that line of reasoning is pretty much bunk. What is inferior, anyway? "Real food" is definitely inferior in terms of how much time it takes to prepare, say – and you can't assume that everyone has the same value system (e.g. taste over everything). Cost and convenience are absolutely essential factors to consider with food.
> Most humans are happy to eat real food, and crave it in its most natural form. A strawberry picked at the height of summer. Fish pulled from a river and grilled over wood coals. Sourdough bread made from a twenty-year-old starter, and kneaded by hand. Wine grown on knobby vines, and aged in a dark cellar. Why would you disrupt that?
Some humans, like myself, are also happy to eat "not-real" food like Soylent. Why would you disrupt that? Why is having more choice not just a problem, but a "sickness" as the title suggests?
I frequently see (and dislike) HN comments like "what was the point of this article?" but, in this case, I really have to ask. There are some really good reasons for not liking Soylent, like that it's not entirely proven yet that 100% of nutrients are absorbed when in the form that Soylent takes, so eating it daily may not be giving you all the nutrients you need—along with a bunch of other reasons. Yet this article settles for "it's not real food and people shouldn't be eating it."
N.B. Maybe the real Soylent sickness is that people like me who drink Soylent go on online forums to write walls of text defending it.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- angersock 10y agoA nontrivial number of people eating the new Soylent bar are reporting sickness. That you can't admit that at the same time you want to feel superior about your own choice of food speaks more to your quality as a person than their quality as a company. That said, it was only a few years ago that Soylent had a problem with rat and mold. It's not news to anybody that they've played a bit fast and loose with their product dev--they've just suckered a lot of tech folks into defending them.
- thatswrong0 10y ago> That you can't admit that at the same time you want to feel superior about your own choice of food speaks more to your quality as a person than their quality as a company How on earth did you get this from reading that comment? OP's whole point is that different people have different priorities when it comes to food - nothing about superiority.
- majewsky 10y agoThe "sickness" the article complains about is emphatically not that one, hence the word "Real" in the article's title.