The crux of the article seems to be: > Soylent was developed ... to compress all the nutrition the human body needs to live into one single, easily digesti

The crux of the article seems to be: > Soylent was developed ... to compress all the nutrition the human body needs to live into one single, easily digestible formula. But that is fundamentally the opposite of the way we increasingly want to eat in America and in much of the developed world. Not that I agree or disagree with the author, but who is "we" in this sentence? It seems like that's a veil for the authors opinion. Given the popularity of these food items, doesn't that indicate that the consumers of the developed world have at least some serious desire for these food 2.0 products? ---------------- David Sax is the author of “Save the Deli” and “The Tastemakers.” Well, that explains that.