3 ms·
I know Google has gone the route of removing the steering wheel but it seems that even if vehicles have self-driving capabilities some level of "manual override
by tedajax 10y ago
I know Google has gone the route of removing the steering wheel but it seems that even if vehicles have self-driving capabilities some level of "manual override" will be desirable especially if you're not in a densely populated area. Using a car to pull a stuck vehicle out of the mud is certainly a valid use-case that not everyone will want to give up. Yeah it might become illegal to use manual driving modes on public highways or something but I can't imagine that we're going to be strictly limited to what the GPS software says is a valid destination and I'd find it impressive if software was written for every action people do with cars.
That being said these technology companies always seem to move towards smaller feature sets that intersect with the use-cases of the largest user bases and power users are often forced to hack together their own custom solutions if they don't fall into the general population of users so if anything this article is a warning to not let the Apple's and Google's define how we use self-driving cars.
- gumby 10y agoAny need for a manual controls is a failure of software.
- madsushi 10y agoAnd software has failures.
- khedoros1 10y agoSoftware has a long, long way to go before it accounts for every possible situation where normal people use cars. We'll need manual controls to work around shortcomings in the software for a long time after mostly-autonomous driving becomes the norm.
- gaius 10y agoHaha - every weekend I drive somewhere that GPS is useless.
- titanomachy 10y agoSince you wouldn't use it frequently, maybe it would make sense to have a less obtrusive control in place of the steering wheel. Maybe a joystick by the armrest, or something.