3 ms·
Note that this is (59nm)^2, not 59nm^2. The latter being smaller than the feature size of a 14nm process. Tom's Hardware, of course, gets it wrong.
by reitzensteinm 10y ago
Note that this is (59nm)^2, not 59nm^2. The latter being smaller than the feature size of a 14nm process.
Tom's Hardware, of course, gets it wrong.
- sounds 10y agoThanks, I updated my post with that correction.