3 ms·
I'm confused by the reporting, as I didn't follow Cartwrights case very well. The article states that they are charging him for making false statements to the
by jwtadvice 10y ago
I'm confused by the reporting, as I didn't follow Cartwrights case very well.
The article states that they are charging him for making false statements to the FBI. But also that the Justice Department had been after him because he was a potential leaker of the fact that Stuxnet was an American sabotage project.
The way I'm reading the two together - the article doesn't make this clear - is that the Justice Department had not been able to prove that he was the source of the leaks, but were able to prove that he lied to the FBI during questioning, and so are pursuing a punishment.
Anyone follow this case very closely care to chime in and clarify exactly what's going on? The article and the title are very different.
- mark212 10y agoAgreed. Tough to follow this news report, though I came to the same conclusion as you.