1. He has donated to her campaigns as well, several times. 2. If money that supports speech is equivalent to making that speech, isn't this just a matter of de

1. He has donated to her campaigns as well, several times. 2. If money that supports speech is equivalent to making that speech, isn't this just a matter of degree? 3. I understand. Doesn't my specific example seem absurd, though? 4. But there are many more limitations on money than there are on speech. There is no limit on speech in support of a campaign. There is a limit on money in support of a campaign. Is that not enough evidence that money and speech are not equivalent, at least legally?