> the school's servers, the IT staff and the administrators could all be considered to be part of a child pornography network No, please lets not go to that s

> the school's servers, the IT staff and the administrators could all be considered to be part of a child pornography network No, please lets not go to that silly place. It detracts from the real child pornography issues. We don't need CP laws to convict these people of a crime; the crime they have actually committed. If the administrator was taking pictures of them nude or in sexual positions and then storing them; i.e. with the intent of viewing them sexually, then nail him. But otherwise this is well covered by voyeurism law. A much more appropriate charge.