2 ms·
Clintons say they are running as a team. You can't take the good without the bad. You say women that have settled in court or accused of Clinton of sexual assa
by 551199 10y ago
Clintons say they are running as a team. You can't take the good without the bad.
You say women that have settled in court or accused of Clinton of sexual assault should not be believed. BUT Trumps alleged should be believed. Hillary stated all rape victims have a right to be believed.
In your mind should we or should we not believe women saying they have been raped?
- masklinn 10y ago> You say women that have settled in court or accused of Clinton of sexual assault should not be believed. I never said that, no. What I did say was that their claims were investigated by Starr who had every reason to use them if he could, and he didn't. > BUT Trumps alleged should be believed. See there are a few big differences here. Trump's history of bragging about sexually assaulting women, the coherence of the accusations and Trump's MO, that Gloria Allred has decided to get involved, and that these are not 20+ years old accusations which were already dropped. > In your mind should we or should we not believe women saying they have been raped? You do understand that "we should believe [people] saying they have been raped" means "trust but verify" right? The allegations against Clinton were extensively checked two decades ago by people working against Clinton who had every reason to use these accusation, and they judged them not worth pursuing. Not that the move makes any sense either way, if assault accusations against one candidate's SO are impeachable offenses, what are assault accusations agains the other candidate directly?