3 ms·
>Project Include has the right to choose who they associate with. As does anyone else who blacklists.
by mason240 10y ago
>Project Include has the right to choose who they associate with.
As does anyone else who blacklists.
- M_Grey 10y agoThat's just nonsensical, and you've defined anything with membership as a "blacklist". What makes a blacklist a blacklist, is the list of "undesirables"; you don't just get to point to any body with membership and define all non-members as "blacklisted".
- ominous 10y agoWhy am I blacklisted from using your money? Also, obligatory mention that "blacklist" and "whitelist" are racist terms, and mention of similar spirals of idiocy such as [0] and [1]. [0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801646 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801646 [1] - https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/3185 https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/3185
- M_Grey 10y agoAgain, as you seem not to have understood my point, you are not blacklisted, you have not been invited. There is a difference you're welcome to ignore, but don't be shocked when people don't take your complaints seriously.
- saint_fiasco 10y agoCan't the list in a blacklist be defined by intension (like the set of people who support Trump), or does it have to be by extension (like the set of people whose name is on a literal list)?