3 ms·

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-russia-bank-2-billion/ http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-r... 100%, huh?

by mejari 10y ago

marcoperaza 10y ago
Don't twist my words. I said that they have never leaked fake documents. They clearly have an agenda in what they select for publishing. ================================================ In response to mejari (both of his replies) below, I'm rate-limited: ================================================ Did you even read that article? That's not what it says. They just didn't publish the documents. What it does say is that the hackers that stole the documents were joking about editing them before sending them to wikileaks.
- mejari 10y ago
  They faked the documents by editing their contents to remove data they didn't want released. How is that twisting your words to show that your claim they've never leaked fake documents is false?
  - stale2002 10y ago
    Sooo, then you agree that the documents are true and accurate? You keep using the word fake, and I don't think you know what the work fake means.
    - mejari 10y ago
      No? What part of my comment suggested I agreed they were true and accurate? I laid out what about them was false and inaccurate.
      - stale2002 10y ago
        The part where you said that your problem with wikileaks was that they chose to not release some of the info they have. You didn't say that they released fake data. You implied that all the data that they DID release was true and accurate, but there was some other true data that they didn't release.
        mejari 10y ago
        The fact that they explicitly removed data from their release is faking their release. It's not like there was even an entire release they chose not to do, they did the release but selectively removed a small part of it, seemingly in support of Russia. Then they presented their leak as the entire leak. That is false, they presented a false picture.
- mejari 10y ago
  They leaked falsified documents. Either through receiving falsified documents and releasing them or through falsifying them themselves. Either way your claim is false.

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-russia-bank-2-billion/ http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-r... 100%, huh?

by mejari 10y ago

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-russia-bank-2-billion/ http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-r... 100%, huh?

marcoperaza 10y ago

Don't twist my words. I said that they have never leaked fake documents. They clearly have an agenda in what they select for publishing. ================================================ In response to mejari (both of his replies) below, I'm rate-limited: ================================================ Did you even read that article? That's not what it says. They just didn't publish the documents. What it does say is that the hackers that stole the documents were joking about editing them before sending them to wikileaks.

mejari 10y ago
They faked the documents by editing their contents to remove data they didn't want released. How is that twisting your words to show that your claim they've never leaked fake documents is false?
- stale2002 10y ago
  Sooo, then you agree that the documents are true and accurate? You keep using the word fake, and I don't think you know what the work fake means.
  - mejari 10y ago
    No? What part of my comment suggested I agreed they were true and accurate? I laid out what about them was false and inaccurate.
    - stale2002 10y ago
      The part where you said that your problem with wikileaks was that they chose to not release some of the info they have. You didn't say that they released fake data. You implied that all the data that they DID release was true and accurate, but there was some other true data that they didn't release.
      - mejari 10y ago
        The fact that they explicitly removed data from their release is faking their release. It's not like there was even an entire release they chose not to do, they did the release but selectively removed a small part of it, seemingly in support of Russia. Then they presented their leak as the entire leak. That is false, they presented a false picture.
mejari 10y ago
They leaked falsified documents. Either through receiving falsified documents and releasing them or through falsifying them themselves. Either way your claim is false.