5 ms·

What are the countless and extremely illegal and unethical things?

by jsutton 10y ago

deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
gragas 10y ago
- Hillary and her team deliberately trying to trick the FBI by giving them a "slightly broader" set of emails [1]: "What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Committee that they hav along with some other HRC emails that include a slightly broader set of search terms than the original batch. That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over." - Purposefully witholding all emails that were between HRC and POTUS [2]: "Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will." - Evidence that the DNC purchased craigslist ads in attempt to frame Trump [3] "We’re proud to maintain a “fun” and “friendly work environment, where the boss is always available to meet with his employees. Like it or not, he may greet you with a kiss on the lips or grope you under the meeting table. Interested applicants should send resume, cover letter, and headshot to jobs@trump.com<mailto:jobs@trump.com>" - Clinton Foundation accepting $1 million from Qatar for Bill's birthday. [4] 1. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272 2. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545 3. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803 4. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396
- tonecluster 10y ago
  Can anyone provide any evidence of confirmed illegal activity from a source other than wikileaks? E.g., results of any official investigation, etc.
  - gragas 10y ago
    You can look at the newly-released FBI reports. Here's a few key parts: https://i.sli.mg/Ykms8I.jpg https://i.sli.mg/Ykms8I.jpg
    - tonecluster 10y ago
      "...disregard for protocol" is not illegal activity. Any indictments, for example? Anything to back up the claim of illegal activity that could lead to a conviction? Again, outside of wikileaks hacked emails.
      - vehementi 10y ago
        Why dismiss wikileaks?
  - hindsightbias 10y ago
    Since zero of those things are illegal or extremely so, it really wouldn't matter.
  - akerro 10y ago
    >E.g., results of any official investigation, etc. Hahahahaha
- danielahn 10y ago
  Is this post satirical? I think I am being trolled, but at the risk of making myself look like a fool for falling for it: How is your reading comprehension this bad? 1. Your understanding of the comment here is miserable given the point you are trying to make. If you should find anything suspicious, it is that the 2nd set of e-mails, with a broader search, included e-mails that should have been turned over previously but weren't. If you want to go down that angle, you think the Benghazi committee would sit on those e-mails and not say anything if there was anything particularly salient in them? 2. You have an issue that State is considering whether releasing POTUS e-mails are subject to executive privilege and should be cleared first? 3. Really? I'll parrot the guys that give out free comedy show tickets - "you don't like to laugh? you don't like humor?" 4. Please point me to the illegal or unethical behavior here.
  - bduerst 10y ago
    User gragas is copying and pasting the same post at this point - they're not interested in discussion as much as astroturfing at this point: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12715525 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12715525
    - danielahn 10y ago
      Gotcha - thanks!
  - shard972 10y ago
    > 4. Please point me to the illegal or unethical behavior here. Well to start, Qatar is funding ISIS according to other emails so maybe don't accept money from states that sponsor terrorism? I mean we could go into how they stone gays for being themselves and women for having the gaul to think they can drive but we all know that's totally ethical.
- taco_emoji 10y ago
  You said "The Clinton Foundation has done countless extremely illegal and unethical things", and yet only one of those items has anything to do with that organization, and "charitable organization accepts charitable donation from Qatar" is perhaps shady at best, barring any important context.

What are the countless and extremely illegal and unethical things?

by jsutton 10y ago

What are the countless and extremely illegal and unethical things?

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

gragas 10y ago

- Hillary and her team deliberately trying to trick the FBI by giving them a "slightly broader" set of emails [1]: "What that means specifically is that they are going to turn over all the Blumenthal emails to the Committee that they hav along with some other HRC emails that include a slightly broader set of search terms than the original batch. That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn't, which will make clear to them that she didn't have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn't turn them over." - Purposefully witholding all emails that were between HRC and POTUS [2]: "Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That's the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will." - Evidence that the DNC purchased craigslist ads in attempt to frame Trump [3] "We’re proud to maintain a “fun” and “friendly work environment, where the boss is always available to meet with his employees. Like it or not, he may greet you with a kiss on the lips or grope you under the meeting table. Interested applicants should send resume, cover letter, and headshot to jobs@trump.com<mailto:jobs@trump.com>" - Clinton Foundation accepting $1 million from Qatar for Bill's birthday. [4] 1. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272 2. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545 3. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803 4. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396

tonecluster 10y ago
Can anyone provide any evidence of confirmed illegal activity from a source other than wikileaks? E.g., results of any official investigation, etc.
- gragas 10y ago
  You can look at the newly-released FBI reports. Here's a few key parts: https://i.sli.mg/Ykms8I.jpg https://i.sli.mg/Ykms8I.jpg
  - tonecluster 10y ago
    "...disregard for protocol" is not illegal activity. Any indictments, for example? Anything to back up the claim of illegal activity that could lead to a conviction? Again, outside of wikileaks hacked emails.
    - vehementi 10y ago
      Why dismiss wikileaks?
- hindsightbias 10y ago
  Since zero of those things are illegal or extremely so, it really wouldn't matter.
- akerro 10y ago
  >E.g., results of any official investigation, etc. Hahahahaha
danielahn 10y ago
Is this post satirical? I think I am being trolled, but at the risk of making myself look like a fool for falling for it: How is your reading comprehension this bad? 1. Your understanding of the comment here is miserable given the point you are trying to make. If you should find anything suspicious, it is that the 2nd set of e-mails, with a broader search, included e-mails that should have been turned over previously but weren't. If you want to go down that angle, you think the Benghazi committee would sit on those e-mails and not say anything if there was anything particularly salient in them? 2. You have an issue that State is considering whether releasing POTUS e-mails are subject to executive privilege and should be cleared first? 3. Really? I'll parrot the guys that give out free comedy show tickets - "you don't like to laugh? you don't like humor?" 4. Please point me to the illegal or unethical behavior here.
- bduerst 10y ago
  User gragas is copying and pasting the same post at this point - they're not interested in discussion as much as astroturfing at this point: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12715525 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12715525
  - danielahn 10y ago
    Gotcha - thanks!
- shard972 10y ago
  > 4. Please point me to the illegal or unethical behavior here. Well to start, Qatar is funding ISIS according to other emails so maybe don't accept money from states that sponsor terrorism? I mean we could go into how they stone gays for being themselves and women for having the gaul to think they can drive but we all know that's totally ethical.
taco_emoji 10y ago
You said "The Clinton Foundation has done countless extremely illegal and unethical things", and yet only one of those items has anything to do with that organization, and "charitable organization accepts charitable donation from Qatar" is perhaps shady at best, barring any important context.