2 ms·
>Is incessant fear-mongering manipulation the inevitable dystopian end of a society that is always connected to channels of mass communication? No, it's the re
by eli_gottlieb 10y ago
>Is incessant fear-mongering manipulation the inevitable dystopian end of a society that is always connected to channels of mass communication?
No, it's the result of leaving nonfiction communication to the lowest-common-denominator of market forces. Just look at Great Britain: sure, they've got Rupert Murdoch, but they've also got the BBC.
- astrocat 10y ago> it's the result of leaving nonfiction communication to the lowest-common-denominator of market forces. but seriously, what's the alternative? How do you avoid market forces? What process does a culture need to undergo to pull it's journalism away from market forces and enshrine it so that it is no longer a commodity afflicted by the market's weaknesses? Is the BBC one such isolated place where the culture of the UK that supports it simply expects it to always have a higher standard, market demands be damned? How did it get there? Or more cynically, how much longer can it last?