3 ms·

I'm actually not certain what you are getting at. This reads as unambiguously as any media coverage I've seen, to me at least. How could you phrase this any mor

by wbhart 10y ago

I'm actually not certain what you are getting at. This reads as unambiguously as any media coverage I've seen, to me at least. How could you phrase this any more unambiguously than "The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government..." What's more interesting to me is that Wikileaks is mentioned specifically in that release. I'm surprised they did this. They'd surely score more points by not acknowledging that Wikileaks exists. The fact that they did, really clearly supports what the OP said, in my opinion.

alva 10y ago
>The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. At what point in that sentence do they refer to the DNC/Podesta hacks and leaks? These statements are crafted by teams of lawyers to get the wording absolutely correct.