4 ms·

I understand your point but not your cheerfulness. Would you be equally cheerful if it happened to him in US? What if it happened to you on your country?

• tocotun1 10y ago
  If it had happened to me I would be really mad, but it hasn't happened to me, so I can talk about how I feel about this in an unbiased way. And I feel like this: I'm happy to see that a product that has no actual value (a retractile stick) is produced at a very cheap price. If only the "inventor of the retractile stick" had the rights to produce it, he'd do it at a very inflated price. Now he can't, and everybody (except him) wins. (All of this assuming he would be granted a patent on a retractile stick, which I very much doubt)
  • quickben 10y ago
    Well, that's a fair point. On a side note, the current pattent system needs combing. There are so many junk previous-art patents that one has to wonder how they got granted.
  • sqeaky 10y ago
    He is only a loser because he had an unreasonable goal: "I want hundreds of thousands of pounds/dollars, for a showerthought and to control the production of an easily copyable device with mere pennies of raw materials in it" If he had a reasonable goal like "I want a bunch of retractable selfie sticks" then he would be a winner too. He has lost nothing and now can buy selfie sticks for $10. Why doesn't buy a bunch and put his logo on them and resell them for $30?