4 ms·
We were supposed to be nation of 'Jeffersons', or at least educated people with skin in the game. Only educated and land owning males were allowed the vote. I'
by hiram112 10y ago
We were supposed to be nation of 'Jeffersons', or at least educated people with skin in the game. Only educated and land owning males were allowed the vote.
I'm sure part of the reason non land owners, slaves, women, etc. were not allowed to vote was in order to keep a certain group in power, but there have been many writers who correctly predicted what happens when everyone is allowed to vote:
"A democracy can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury."
The fact that you have something like 1/2 the citizens working and subsidizing the other half, along with our 24 hour news cycle that cannot be trusted anymore than Pravda at its worst, and I think we will probably look back and realize allowing everyone a vote is a bad idea, or no better than a monarchy or some other rule by a select few.
Not that I have a better idea, though
- tzs 10y ago> We were supposed to be nation of 'Jeffersons', or at least educated people with skin in the game. Only educated and land owning males were allowed the vote. What states include being educated as an input to their voter eligibility determination?
- tedunangst 10y agoThe presumption was that being a land owner was correlated with education. If not formal education, then at least an active interest in being informed about current affairs.