> Seems like it has no regard for privacy by the sound of it. IPFS is an infrastructure building block. You are judging it by throwing out "privacy" like all t

> Seems like it has no regard for privacy by the sound of it. IPFS is an infrastructure building block. You are judging it by throwing out "privacy" like all things need to implement privacy without regards to the fact it's the application layer that should be responsible for the "security" of the "private" communication. I could seed an encrypted file on IPFS and then put a bounty out on it for people to cache it aggressively. I'll increase bounty if you've cached for me before and I'll increase bounty for anyone caching it around a particular timeframe. Any agent looking for my contact who is downloading that file doesn't know if they know the file is for my contact or not.