It's an interesting point of view; one often raised in less-serious contexts lamenting the 24-hour news cycle and the sensationalism of news. The psychology beh

It's an interesting point of view; one often raised in less-serious contexts lamenting the 24-hour news cycle and the sensationalism of news. The psychology behind how we tend to remember bad events over good is also a likely contributor, as they point out. But perhaps it's even more obvious why the survey-takers in such developed countries as Sweden, UK, and USA are of the belief that the world is not such a good place after all: it's not getting better for them. The World Economic Forum came to this conclusion in their study asking essentially the same thing [1]. Globalization's main beneficiaries are developing countries' lower working class, who can luck out and be uplifted with higher wages and higher quality of life -- and, of course, the global rich. Meanwhile, the extreme poor and developed countries' working class sees little tangible improvement. This is reflected in the rise of political movements that are isolationist, protectionist, and anti-immigration, as they believe (whether rightfully or falsely, that's an open question) that those policies will improve their local fortunes when the opposite policies did not. This appears to show that as the economic outlook of certain classes of people improves, the economic outlook of other classes remains stagnant or worsens. Some people insist that the economy isn't a zero-sum game -- and perhaps pedantically, they are correct -- but yet we observe this behavior time and time again. So what gives? [1] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/07/people-are-angry-about-globalization-this-chart-explains-why/ https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/07/people-are-angry-abou...