3 ms·

I understand the confusion since they share a word, but they are entirely different. EG part-time partners don't have a legal vote in the direction of YC.

by sama 10y ago

zorpner 10y ago
EG part-time partners don't have a legal vote in the direction of YC. So, much like how he interacts with the Trump campaign, he provides capital in exchange for...?
idlewords 10y ago
Weak, weak, weak.
- MrMcDowall 10y ago
  Simplify!
  - idlewords 10y ago
    Weak!
johndavi 10y ago
If anything this makes -- should have made -- taking a principled stand drastically easier. It also doesn't follow that a defense then could ever be "we won't fire..." He's not an employee nor a YC vote-carrier nor an equity holder that you seemingly can fire.
hawkice 10y ago
So it would be fairer to say "Part-time Partner" is the name of a role, like "Limited Partner", that sounds like a variation of Partner but is in fact a completely different role with different duties and privileges? This sounds very likely but is hard to deduce from the blog posts. [EDIT: To be more specific: Here (https://blog.ycombinator.com/diversity-and-startups https://blog.ycombinator.com/diversity-and-startups) you mention: "My hope is that YC has enough leverage at this point to make it clear that [inappropriate behavior towards female founders] is unacceptable and we will not continue to work with investors who do it." The whole post is great and speaks to the role you (meaning YC in general) feel it is important to play in supporting women, minority and more generally, 'outsider' founders. The quote illustrates you've not ruled out severing business ties to investors who make 'outsider' founders uncomfortable. Here (http://blog.samaltman.com/trump http://blog.samaltman.com/trump), you are talking about Trump: "Demagogic hate-mongers lead down terrible paths. It would be particularly embarrassing for us to fall for this[.]" In the same piece about Trump, you reference Trump's policy regarding 'outsiders' in particular, and the famous quote, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." You also state "This would be a good time for us all—even Republicans, especially Republican politicians who previously endorsed Trump—to start speaking up." The primary confusion is that, despite the fact "[you]’ve supported some Republicans in the past", you _aren't_ speaking up and clarifying the impact of a major Trump surrogate with a potentially misleading(?) title within YC itself. So while some others are indicating you're engaged in pedantry, I am actually very interested in the exact role of various YC partner or partner-esque people. I think this is a case where details might matter, but so far YC has been oddly silent. To the extent such a confusion can be averted, I'd be interested in your thoughts, but appreciate this can be quite a needle to thread.]
chromatic 10y ago
EG part-time partners don't have a legal vote in the direction of YC. Are "part-time partners" employees?
n72 10y ago
Ah, the nit pick defense! And a weak one at that.

I understand the confusion since they share a word, but they are entirely different. EG part-time partners don't have a legal vote in the direction of YC.

by sama 10y ago

I understand the confusion since they share a word, but they are entirely different. EG part-time partners don't have a legal vote in the direction of YC.

zorpner 10y ago

EG part-time partners don't have a legal vote in the direction of YC. So, much like how he interacts with the Trump campaign, he provides capital in exchange for...?

idlewords 10y ago

Weak, weak, weak.

MrMcDowall 10y ago
Simplify!
- idlewords 10y ago
  Weak!

johndavi 10y ago

If anything this makes -- should have made -- taking a principled stand drastically easier. It also doesn't follow that a defense then could ever be "we won't fire..." He's not an employee nor a YC vote-carrier nor an equity holder that you seemingly can fire.

hawkice 10y ago

So it would be fairer to say "Part-time Partner" is the name of a role, like "Limited Partner", that sounds like a variation of Partner but is in fact a completely different role with different duties and privileges? This sounds very likely but is hard to deduce from the blog posts. [EDIT: To be more specific: Here (https://blog.ycombinator.com/diversity-and-startups https://blog.ycombinator.com/diversity-and-startups) you mention: "My hope is that YC has enough leverage at this point to make it clear that [inappropriate behavior towards female founders] is unacceptable and we will not continue to work with investors who do it." The whole post is great and speaks to the role you (meaning YC in general) feel it is important to play in supporting women, minority and more generally, 'outsider' founders. The quote illustrates you've not ruled out severing business ties to investors who make 'outsider' founders uncomfortable. Here (http://blog.samaltman.com/trump http://blog.samaltman.com/trump), you are talking about Trump: "Demagogic hate-mongers lead down terrible paths. It would be particularly embarrassing for us to fall for this[.]" In the same piece about Trump, you reference Trump's policy regarding 'outsiders' in particular, and the famous quote, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." You also state "This would be a good time for us all—even Republicans, especially Republican politicians who previously endorsed Trump—to start speaking up." The primary confusion is that, despite the fact "[you]’ve supported some Republicans in the past", you _aren't_ speaking up and clarifying the impact of a major Trump surrogate with a potentially misleading(?) title within YC itself. So while some others are indicating you're engaged in pedantry, I am actually very interested in the exact role of various YC partner or partner-esque people. I think this is a case where details might matter, but so far YC has been oddly silent. To the extent such a confusion can be averted, I'd be interested in your thoughts, but appreciate this can be quite a needle to thread.]

chromatic 10y ago

EG part-time partners don't have a legal vote in the direction of YC. Are "part-time partners" employees?

n72 10y ago

Ah, the nit pick defense! And a weak one at that.