2 ms·
Laws themselves aren't inherently Constitutional. It's their application vis a vis a particular scenario which must withstand scrutiny. In this case, the quest
by throwaway76543 10y ago
Laws themselves aren't inherently Constitutional. It's their application vis a vis a particular scenario which must withstand scrutiny.
In this case, the question is whether a charge of "rioting" or "trespassing" or whichever charge is currently in play withstands this scrutiny. Generally, application of these laws pass Constitutional muster. On occasion, they do not.