3 ms·
As for the logic behind our decimal digits, there was an explanation going around for it, but at best it's probably reaching very hard. I'll let you decide: htt
by yawaramin 10y ago
As for the logic behind our decimal digits, there was an explanation going around for it, but at best it's probably reaching very hard. I'll let you decide: http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=49183 http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=49183
- drostie 10y agoThe actual logic is a bit more benign. Once upon a time, the digit for 0 was a dot, the digit for 1 was (close to) ι, the digit for 2 was (close to) μ, the digit for 3 was close to w with a leading descender like μ has. The digit for 4 might have been closer to a + sign that eventually morphed to look more like a backwards 2. It was the number of vertical lines which encoded 1, 2, or 3; with 4 and 5 and 6 there was more need to come up with more-abstract symbols. In Arabic these first 4 digits have actually survived relatively unmolested, ٠ - ١ - ٢ - ٣, while the backwards 2 for 4 started hooking down to become a ٤ and some other stuff happened with the next 5 digits. In English the digits for 2, 3, and 4 all rotated about 90 degrees counterclockwise while the tail disappeared for the 3 and the 4 didn't close up on the top until relatively late.