Or the reasonable thing for them to do is address the issue? No organization in the article said they were going to stop but instead reiterated their commitment

Or the reasonable thing for them to do is address the issue? No organization in the article said they were going to stop but instead reiterated their commitment to spreading knowledge, as they should. As for your last point, it's very disingenuous to paint the NAD as wanting to deprive others of something rather than wanting to allow disabled people to access something. We're not talking about food which has alternatives, but rather something which isn't accessible at all to deaf people, something which the law mandates with the Americans With Disabilities Act.