I was being facetious about them calling you, but somebody has to make a start. > they had the opportunity to do the right thing, and instead they did the easy

I was being facetious about them calling you, but somebody has to make a start. > they had the opportunity to do the right thing, and instead they did the easy thing, which was to take it away. Nope, by providing it for free they definitely were adding. As you will see when they take it offline, it was completely additional. EDIT: I see you were talking about UC Berkley, I though "they" referred to Harvard and M.I.T, my mistake. Yeah, they took it away, but lawsuits have that effect. I doubt the plaintiffs would have settled for "we'll crowdsource the captions" :) > They should start with an inclusive perspective that eliminates the need for lawsuits IDK. It's taken millennia to get to where we are. Improvement isn't an option? A campaign to crowdsource the close captions might have been far more effective and definitely less mean-spirited than a lawsuit. The all-or-nothing approach isn't practical and will likely result in nothing.