3 ms·
I don't buy your reading, sorry. It doesn't make sense. Sarcastically: How do I know you're not a protestor too? Are you one of them? Where is your "refuse
by logicallee 10y ago
I don't buy your reading, sorry. It doesn't make sense.
Sarcastically: How do I know you're not a protestor too? Are you one of them? Where is your "refuse to belong to any union petition" signature? Who did you vote for?
Protestor doesn't mean "someone who illegally obstructs or damages property'. This word doesn't mean that. It is impossible to read the quote this way,
> Erickson told the Grand Forks Herald that he did not, in fact, consider Goodman a journalist.
even if you bend over backwards like this: http://files.doobybrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bending-over-backwards.jpg http://files.doobybrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bendi...
Because it specifically talks about her status as a journalist, rather than participation or non-participation in what you call obstruction. It doesn't tallk about whether she obstructed anything - or was guilty of any crime. It talks about whether she's a journalist.
As a matter of fact I would like you to reread it and agree with my reading. Thanks.
-
Edit to your reply: ok. we read it differently. I can agree that there's a bit of interpretation involved here.
- maxerickson 10y agoAs a matter of fact I would like you to reread it and agree with my reading. Thanks. No.