4 ms·
If the argument is that this saves on network hardware costs, then you'd think ISPs would have some incentive to invest in decentralization as well. But I'm no
by smallnamespace 10y ago
If the argument is that this saves on network hardware costs, then you'd think ISPs would have some incentive to invest in decentralization as well.
But I'm not so sure about the thesis that it's just a software issue. It seems wasteful to sling electrons through a backbone and back when those bits are (physically) close by, but the cost here is not the distance those bits traveled, but the marginal cost of the physical hardware to deliver those bits to your doorstep.
It's probably much cheaper, on a cost-per-bandwidth basis, to beef up the existing backbone, because significant economies of scale exist.
OTOH, there's a significant fixed cost every time you try to widen edge links (it's very expensive to dig up and replace residential cables).
- barnacs 10y agoMy ISP would certainly love if my whole local area (building/street/district/whatever) only fetched each unique piece of data once through their network and then distributed it locally via mesh networks. It's just that they can't make it happen by themselves. It needs to be supported by network protocols, which need support from content providers and content consumers as well, so it goes way beyond the reach of ISPs.