Thank you for the extensive reply! Maybe my intuition is: the world is round. And your reply is: no, there are mountains, rotation flattens the poles, the moon

Thank you for the extensive reply! Maybe my intuition is: the world is round. And your reply is: no, there are mountains, rotation flattens the poles, the moon causes bulges (the tides) due the the earth's constant falling to the center of the earth/moon system. An intuition is an extremely zoomed out/abstract version of the real thing. Not saying that this is the case. Perhaps in the above analogy the world is actually square, or donut shaped, and so my intuition is way off. But I am out of my depth to judge. So I am hoping you can. If a high schooler had my kind of intuition, or no intuition at all, with which situation would you be happier? I can say that "Conversely, this rules out observers who see identical probabilities everywhere." is a good point, but also what I meant by "chance function", as apposed to an equal chance for all the points. In the quantum eraser experiment, even if you erase (or not) on a much longer path, the result is the same. But it is no ftl comm, because the other observer needs the eraser data to filter the photons and find the signal. But what causes that randomness, knowing that we can rule out hidden state? In my intuition, because it is all evaluated at once. But what is the birds eye view of that answer if it is better not to have that intuition?