3 ms·
> > Mozilla was driven into the ground by better competition > I thought it was Microsoft's anti-competitive strategy? (bundling IE, changing the API's to brea
by tired_man 10y ago
> > Mozilla was driven into the ground by better competition
> I thought it was Microsoft's anti-competitive strategy? (bundling IE, changing the API's to break netscape, etc.)
I thought it was Mozilla's utter lack of regard for the their userbase.
- Mathnerd314 10y agoThat came later, after they decided that they preferred politics to market share. (sometime around 2008-09, judging from the TIFF support bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160261#c39 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160261#c39)
- tired_man 10y agoTIFF. It might have been handy in certain instances, but IMHO, it was never been a big deal except in the page-layout world. And even then, having an eps was better. I missed that cluster of madness for firefox, I guess. Had I known that Mozilla would turn out this way, I would never have donated money. My name is on their full-page NYT ad and poster. I wonder if they'd give me a refund?
- jimmywanger 10y agoMicrosoft might have been part of it, but check out http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html. They waited 3 years before a new release. In internet terms, it's like 21 years between any new features. During that time, IE was (IMO) the best browser objectively, in almost every sense of the word. They didn't change the APIs per se to break Netscape, they started giving features that Netscape didn't offer because users wanted them.