I can explain a bit about this. I am a libertarian-authoritarian mix myself. Basically, I believe the best government is a local authoritarian government, whe

I can explain a bit about this. I am a libertarian-authoritarian mix myself. Basically, I believe the best government is a local authoritarian government, where variables are known, and the ruler is close to the population, for example Singapore. When you go stupid-big sized countries (like US, Brazil, Russia...), you have a problem: these countries have too much land and populations to manage efficiently. In those cases, the ideal solution would be a libertarian FEDERAL government, while local governments (municipalities and states) can do "whatever" they want as long it doesn't put national security in danger. That said, there are some authoritarian rules, that if applied to the whole country, aren't 100% bad, they are not ideal, but it might work, for example avoiding war, encouraging reproduction (specially among the elites), protecting your economy from external threats, reducing the economy internal mess (subsidies specially are problematic), and so on.