2 ms·
Precisely. The inability of a person to choose their desired path because they need money to feed their family is textbook economic coercion. We've long passed
by rorykoehler 10y ago
Precisely. The inability of a person to choose their desired path because they need money to feed their family is textbook economic coercion. We've long passed the point where lack of resources (especially food) is a physical/natural constraint.
- icebraining 10y agoWhat does "choose their desired path" mean exactly?
- msandford 10y agoWhat would a person who had a family that needed feeding do in the absence of government entirely? My guess is that they would perform some kind of activity in an attempt to feed them. You can take money and even capitalism out of the equation entirely and people would still work. That Russian family that cut themselves off from the outside for 40 years in the wilderness still worked to survive. The food didn't grow itself and then climb into their mouths to be eaten.