3 ms·
As a note, breaking into subtasks does improve estimate accuracy on just about anything, due to the "unpacking effect". Humans routinely underestimate the time
by jacques_chester 10y ago
As a note, breaking into subtasks does improve estimate accuracy on just about anything, due to the "unpacking effect".
Humans routinely underestimate the time and difficulty involved in just about everything. Breaking a task down into subtasks leads to higher estimates which will typically be more accurate.
You are of course being asked to do something very difficult. In 3-point estimation schemes, you'd give back very wide bands for a few subtasks that you identified. Maybe point at the cone of uncertainty a few times.
I know it often doesn't work. To me, most of the problems with estimating aren't with the estimating.
- bbcbasic 10y agoThat's true the problem here is the negotiation process. If you have a technical manager they can use the technical hat to argue the estimate down. And the manager hat is the motivation to do so. I kinda prefer the planning poker where all members are encouraged to have equal say and there is no power imbalance