4 ms·
Not to take from noob experience but google just has less features and services. When/if they have as many it will be similar mess. It's already getting there.
by hrez 10y ago
Not to take from noob experience but google just has less features and services. When/if they have as many it will be similar mess. It's already getting there. Also, you could import your own key in aws. Though I agree that aws could benefit from global settings across regions like keys, cloutrails, config and so on. With more regions coming up it becomes unnecessary noise to manage each region separately.
- cobookman 10y agoWhat features is google cloud missing that's stopping you from switching today. A lot of Googlers lurk these forms and I'm sure they'd love the feedback.
- hrez 10y agoIt does not answer your question straight but here are some things that stared at me in the first week though perhaps there is a way I don't know about: 1. No tag based billing ala aws. The only way to separate bills seems to be using projects. Which means separate networks. Which means more vpn needed to tie it all together to corp network? 2. Need more granular IAM scopes. I.e. I want a user that gets readonly for compute, disks and snapshots and create/delete for snapshots. 3. Tags are labels are tags? For me that was a bit of wtf moment. It might have its reasons but I want to add labels without possibility to trigger firewall rules. For that matter why labels are alpha feature? It's not like it's a new service.
- rmykhajliw 10y agoALL. 1. billing - is stoped accepting my card a year ago (when card expired) and didn't work so far. I wrote to support, called - nothing. 2. Highly unintuitive interface, I spent 2 days to run a single instance, WTF ???. 3. Useless support 4. Limited API 5. Limited access/roles system 6. Almost no support of external deploy/release tools 7. No logs/events collecting/processing service Google is not suitable for development at all.