4 ms·
Depends on what you mean by "goes against the will of the voters". There have been close elections where one candidate won the popular vote and the other won t
by _kst_ 10y ago
Depends on what you mean by "goes against the will of the voters".
There have been close elections where one candidate won the popular vote and the other won the electoral vote. That hasn't led to the electoral college being abolished.
If you're talking about faithless electors, they have so far never affected the outcome of an election. If they did, I'm sure the calls for reform would become even louder than they are now.
If the electors were intended to be able to exercise their own judgement, it hasn't really worked that way in practice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector
- macintux 10y agoI found a discussion of the topic in the Federalist papers this year because it seemed it might be relevant. Don't have the citation handy but they were absolutely intended to exercise their own judgment in the event of a patently unqualified candidate.
- inimino 10y agoIt is interesting to speculate what would happen if that occurred in this election.