3 ms·
Based on past history, we can assume they have to give Trump a higher than average of the current polls chance to win.
by tomjen3 10y ago
Based on past history, we can assume they have to give Trump a higher than average of the current polls chance to win.
- umanwizard 10y agoWhat do you mean?
- lern_too_spel 10y agoSilver consistently underestimated Trump's chances in the primaries. He has yet to explain what he did wrong then or how he has fixed it now. If you don't want a Trump presidency, Silver's current projections shouldn't be very comforting.
- umanwizard 10y agoRight, but a lot of other poll aggregators who don't have that baggage are also predicting a Clinton win, many with higher confidence than Nate Silver.
- lern_too_spel 10y agoDid their polling analysis correctly predict Trump's nomination?