4 ms·

/pol/:/sg/ helped the Russian airforce identify rebels positions in Syria and destroy them. It is not all bullshit at all; there is a significant proportion of

/pol/:/sg/ helped the Russian airforce identify rebels positions in Syria and destroy them. It is not all bullshit at all; there is a significant proportion of it that is undeniably childish garbage but there is the occasional gem as well.

cryoshon 10y ago
source? if true, this would be a troubling precedent in the use of third party analysis in conducting military operations
- konart 10y ago
  https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/4deu8r/pol_helps_coordinate_an_airstrike_on_moderate/ https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/4deu8r/pol_helps_coo... Can't find a better source. But this was the second time RuAF bombed the rebles camp after third party analysis (might be a coincidence ofc). There was a different image with Russian MoD's report on the matter.
- v64 10y ago
  Not sure how much of this, if any, has been corroborated, but this [1] is a description of the events. [1] http://www.vocativ.com/326039/how-one-4chan-board-is-trying-to-fight-isis-in-syria/ http://www.vocativ.com/326039/how-one-4chan-board-is-trying-...
- AvenueIngres 10y ago
  I occasionally lurk on 4chan (in particular /sg/ since they aggregate lots of data regarding the Syrian civil war) and I witnessed this one particular event first hand. Now I understand that this is not a verifiable source but I found this as well, that sums-up the whole thing: http://2static.fjcdn.com/pictures/4chan+pol+sg+orders+an+airstirkes_b88f6f_5880308.jpg http://2static.fjcdn.com/pictures/4chan+pol+sg+orders+an+air... I don't think you will be able to find anything better than that to "prove" it happened.
  - astrodust 10y ago
    Giving military "intel" from 4chan is absolutely insane. These were the same people that thought they'd conclusively identified the Boston Marathon bomber, but were totally wrong.
    - niftich 10y ago
      I'm pretty sure that was Reddit [1] [1] http://wayback.archive-it.org/3649/20130422194045/http://www.reddit.com/r/findbostonbombers/ http://wayback.archive-it.org/3649/20130422194045/http://www...
      - astrodust 10y ago
        I'm sure 4chan is held to a higher standard.
      - sixo 10y ago
        Just for the record, reddit ran with it after picking it up from (I think) the police scanner.
        niftich 10y ago
        This is true. I remember firsthand the #scanner hashtag on Twitter and various re-streamers broadcasting the scanner online, as CNN and other outlets were trying to confirm facts and keep up coverage. It was a surreal experience, and it showed both the strengths and weaknesses of crowdsourced tweets as "news". You get a lot of info, about how people think and feel but the facts being thrown about can be faulty and need to be confirmed independently. It wasn't until the unfortunate events in Ferguson a year and a half later than a similar kind and intensity of social media coverage ensued.
    - AvenueIngres 10y ago
      It's not like they could send UAVs to verify if the claims are legit? It's literally written on the screenshot that the Russians sent drones; and Ivan is obviously a Russian intelligence officer. Breathe!

cryoshon 10y ago

source? if true, this would be a troubling precedent in the use of third party analysis in conducting military operations

konart 10y ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/4deu8r/pol_helps_coordinate_an_airstrike_on_moderate/ https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/4deu8r/pol_helps_coo... Can't find a better source. But this was the second time RuAF bombed the rebles camp after third party analysis (might be a coincidence ofc). There was a different image with Russian MoD's report on the matter.
v64 10y ago
Not sure how much of this, if any, has been corroborated, but this [1] is a description of the events. [1] http://www.vocativ.com/326039/how-one-4chan-board-is-trying-to-fight-isis-in-syria/ http://www.vocativ.com/326039/how-one-4chan-board-is-trying-...
AvenueIngres 10y ago
I occasionally lurk on 4chan (in particular /sg/ since they aggregate lots of data regarding the Syrian civil war) and I witnessed this one particular event first hand. Now I understand that this is not a verifiable source but I found this as well, that sums-up the whole thing: http://2static.fjcdn.com/pictures/4chan+pol+sg+orders+an+airstirkes_b88f6f_5880308.jpg http://2static.fjcdn.com/pictures/4chan+pol+sg+orders+an+air... I don't think you will be able to find anything better than that to "prove" it happened.
- astrodust 10y ago
  Giving military "intel" from 4chan is absolutely insane. These were the same people that thought they'd conclusively identified the Boston Marathon bomber, but were totally wrong.
  - niftich 10y ago
    I'm pretty sure that was Reddit [1] [1] http://wayback.archive-it.org/3649/20130422194045/http://www.reddit.com/r/findbostonbombers/ http://wayback.archive-it.org/3649/20130422194045/http://www...
    - astrodust 10y ago
      I'm sure 4chan is held to a higher standard.
    - sixo 10y ago
      Just for the record, reddit ran with it after picking it up from (I think) the police scanner.
      - niftich 10y ago
        This is true. I remember firsthand the #scanner hashtag on Twitter and various re-streamers broadcasting the scanner online, as CNN and other outlets were trying to confirm facts and keep up coverage. It was a surreal experience, and it showed both the strengths and weaknesses of crowdsourced tweets as "news". You get a lot of info, about how people think and feel but the facts being thrown about can be faulty and need to be confirmed independently. It wasn't until the unfortunate events in Ferguson a year and a half later than a similar kind and intensity of social media coverage ensued.
  - AvenueIngres 10y ago
    It's not like they could send UAVs to verify if the claims are legit? It's literally written on the screenshot that the Russians sent drones; and Ivan is obviously a Russian intelligence officer. Breathe!