3 ms·
Maybe it's the whole "better to have false negatives than false positives" philosophy Google espouses?
by brazzledazzle 10y ago
Maybe it's the whole "better to have false negatives than false positives" philosophy Google espouses?
- klodolph 10y agoThat's part of it, but the other part is what you mentioned earlier--leads, quotas, conversions, and don't forget diversity initiatives, inexperienced recruiters, and the fact that the first part of the funnel has to be dirt cheap to work at scale. For what it's worth, lots of other companies seem to use almost the exact same process.
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoThe problem is, once you have a crud ton of false negatives, people stop wanting to apply to work for you, especially when you get excluded via junk like this. And every false negative that posts about it online... well, this post is at +1363 right now?