3 ms·
Meta question: what do you consider spammy about this blog post? It seems like a perfectly fine, digestible narrative of the product without requiring the reade
by jplahn 10y ago
Meta question: what do you consider spammy about this blog post? It seems like a perfectly fine, digestible narrative of the product without requiring the reader to sift through a product page.
On a more related note, I find it interesting that the product page says there's a 4 year warranty on the camera body. I didn't see anything about the warranty on the mod itself.
- andrewguenther 10y agoI agree, the blog post is a much better quality post. Also, I would imagine a direct link to a product page would turn a lot of people off.
- foenix 10y agoOh, looks like the OP link was updated since I posted that. The original link was to Gizmodo: https://gizmodo.com/this-upgraded-nikon-chills-the-sensor-for-clearer-shots-1787743794 https://gizmodo.com/this-upgraded-nikon-chills-the-sensor-fo... I should have linked to the original Petapixel post on the bottom of that Gizmodo page. My bad.
- jychang 10y agoPetapixel is half blogspam anyways, a tiny step up from Gizmodo. It was actually banned from r/photography for spam reasons.