3 ms·
> On the other hand, some of the people who now are claiming Bill is a rapist once testified under oath that he did _not_ rape them. Yet other women have consi
by nartsbtaa 10y ago
> On the other hand, some of the people who now are claiming Bill is a rapist once testified under oath that he did _not_ rape them.
Yet other women have consistently claimed over decades that Clinton sexually assaulted them. And today women are coming forward accusing Trump of sexual assault.
There seems to be very little difference; both men have probably assaulted women in the past and abused their power to get away with it. I don't think arbitrarily slanting the narrative to defend one and condemn the other serves anybody. In fact, sweeping sexual assault under the rug when it doesn't serve your political agenda is a pretty horrible thing to do.
- CocaKoala 10y agoWell, one significant difference here is that Donald Trump is running for President, and Bill Clinton isn't.
- duncanawoods 10y agoBarely. The Clintons have long campaigned as a two for one deal. She announced that if elected, he will be "in charge of reinvigorating the economy". http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/us/politics/bill-hillary-clinton-administration-economy.html http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/us/politics/bill-hillary-c...
- popmystack 10y agoThere is nothing arbitrary about evidence based statements. Everything I stated is completely based on evidence from multiple sources, from the congressional investigations to reporters. So, you can remove your disingenuous label of "my political agenda." just because you want to falsely equivocate things based on what you feel is probably true from hearsay and claims, instead of what is actually known based on evidence and legal testimony.