3 ms·
Interesting. I'd wait to hear their answer - if it's a CSV bottlenecking at 0.2 MB/sec instead of 200 MB/sec it would be interesting (which is the three orders
by logicallee 10y ago
Interesting. I'd wait to hear their answer - if it's a CSV bottlenecking at 0.2 MB/sec instead of 200 MB/sec it would be interesting (which is the three orders of magnitude you state). But with all that said, they reported a 62x improvement, so 1.8 orders of magnitude.
- fnord123 10y ago0.2MB/s parsing logs or basically any file is absolutely terrible. Hence why thomas-st wrote his own parser. Parsing at 2MB/s (rounding up the 1.8 to 2 order of magnitude) is also pretty poor.