Not surprised this is coming from the NYT. They've been one of Clinton's media arms since the beginning, even before her fight against Trump. It's interesting

Not surprised this is coming from the NYT. They've been one of Clinton's media arms since the beginning, even before her fight against Trump. It's interesting to see great "ethical minds" (whether at NYT or elsewhere) tell us now that it's "wrong" for Wikileaks to publish data, possibly even incriminating data, such as for instance the latest email I read about Clinton camp implanting staff on Biden's team to derail his potential campaign, because this would "help Trump". This argument is no different than the decision the NYT already made with Bush' mass surveillance "Program", when NYT decided to delay it until after the election year. Because why? The terrorists would've won? Give me a break. This is the kind of editorial decisions you can expect from the NYT. When in doubt, side with those already in power, or most likely to take the power.